Sunday, February 23, 2020

Explain the 2 clauses and 3 Key elements Contained in the fourth Essay

Explain the 2 clauses and 3 Key elements Contained in the fourth Amendment that specifically pertains to search and seizure. be - Essay Example As provided by the second clause and explained in the Johnson case a valid search warrant must contain the following requirement: 1.) It must be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate; 2.) there must be presented to the magistrate an adequate showing of probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, usually in the form of an affidavit from a police officer; 3.) the warrant must describe with particularity the place to be searched and the items or persons to be seized. A neutral magistrate as provided in Shadwick v. City of Tampa (1972) must be â€Å"neutral and detached† and â€Å"capable of determining whether probable cause exists for the requested arrest or search.† Probable cause on the other hand means contemplates facts and circumstances within an officer’s personal knowledge that are sufficient â€Å"to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed.† Carroll v. United States (1925). And the s tandard of particularity as required for a valid warrant that the description be sufficiently precise in so that the officer executing the warrant can â€Å"with reasonable effort ascertain and identify the place intended (Steele v. Unites States [1925]) and that it leaves nothing to the discretion of the officers to inquire further (Marron v. United [1927)]).

Friday, February 7, 2020

Hans Jonas's Technology and Responsibility W3 Disc Assignment

Hans Jonas's Technology and Responsibility W3 Disc - Assignment Example Jonas (2011) clearly indicates that novel technological advances have made the world prone to human action. This can be evidenced in environmental degradation and the effect of industrialization on the society. From this passage, it is warranted to argue that the relationship between human world and non-human world is questionable. The most important claim that Jonas (2011) makes is that human beings have an ethical responsibility towards nature. Philosophically, this is referred to as metaphysical concept (Winston & Edelbach, 2011). Jonas (2011) is clear on his discussion as he clearly brings out the shift of focus on addressing issues touching on nature, and that a lot of focus is put on human civilization. Jonas (2011) fails to explain the Science of nature, as natural science is not inclusive of all matters of Science. The author allows him attain his objective, as he convinces the reader on the need to be responsible on the non-human world, just we are on the human. Conclusively, Jonas (2011) article calls for collective responsibility for our actions especially towards the environment, and is practical in the use of technology. Humans must be keen not to deplete the natural resources in the course of applying technology in various aspects of